It’s rare that Miss B. reacts to a romance (maybe because her choices tend to the tried and true these days) as she did to Amy Sandas’s The Untouchable Earl. About half way through, she wanted to DNF. But there was a sense of purpose and theme to it that said, “No, no, keep reading.” So, she did. And now that it’s done, she doesn’t quite know what to say about it. At its heart is a sexual healing theme that Miss B. despises, akin to her curled-lip reaction to Lisa Valdez’s Passion, possibly rivaling Old Skool romance to be the worst romance novel ever written. And yet, she also can’t dismiss The Untouchable Earl the way she can Passion. Its premise is the stuff of high eye-rolling melodrama. Melodramatic circumstances conspire to bring Plain-Jane husband-seeking ton debutante Lily Chadwick, kidnapped and drugged, up for auction at Madame Pendragon’s, a brothel. It’s all pretty sordid and awful until the eponymous Earl, a hero with possibly the most ridiculous name in romance, Avenell Harte (with, yes, the obvious pun there) purchases Lily and her intact maidenhead. As far as maidenheads go, hers isn’t half as impressive as Passion’s, but still. It doesn’t look like her maidenhead’s in any danger when we find out that Avenell (she’s strictly forbidden from saying his name and when you consider how lame it is, you can understand the guy’s reluctance) … well, he’s functional and all, but he can’t bear to be touched.
When Lily reaches for his manly forearms and such, he’s flinchy and hurt. It’s painful for him, in a way that sounds like a fibromyalgia … or not. Because he only has the skin? nerve? pain and no other symptoms. He’s muscle-bound and huge and can slam villainous pursuers of Lily’s virtue against the wall, shake them like Cyclops shaking a kitten. Ah, but our Lily: she is pure, compassionate, and good and, to extend Sandas credit, she has read books, erotic ones, and knows she wants Avenell as her lover. So, they become lovers – of a sort. Avenell accepts Lily’s offer because she’s got soul-ful grey eyes and he loses himself in them. He wants her, but knows he doesn’t deserve her, because he can’t offer her a full life. He’s damaged – and humourless. As is Lily.
Lily and Avenell embark on a “relationship.” He buys her gifts, opens an account in her name (because she be poor and thus why she and her two sisters, though independent and original, must find husbands among the ton), and awaits her, broodingly, in his carriage every night. They ride to Madame Pendragon’s because meeting in Avenell’s big-assed mansion will not do: it means too much to have the “amazing woman” Lily there, he’ll become too dependent on her gentle, loving, compassionate presence. They fool around – a lot – and it was all too much for Miss B. – with Avenell being commanding, dark, agonized, and morose. Lily takes up the mantle of her pleasure so to speak and they go on like this for oh MissB’d say about 75% of the book. Until Avenell must send Lily away because he wants her to have a normal life with a normal man to ensure they have normal children – even though the ton knows of their trysts and, all things considered, because her magic touch allows him to do the wild thing and she might be pregnant – except that doesn’t occur to these two dunderheads.
We never really find out what happened to poor suffering Avenell, maybe the after-effect of a childhood illness, maybe parental rejection as a result of being a pain-wuss. Miss Bates reached the end of the novel hoping Sandas had one of those cute afterwards where she explains where she got the idea for Avenell’s affliction. Ne’er to be found, dear readers. What can be found is a neatly-tied up HEA that rings false and major sentimental emoting on Lily and Avenell’s part. With Miss Austen, Miss Bates would say that the Untouchable Earl “had a high claim to forbearance,” Emma.
Amy Sandas’s The Untouchable Earl is published by Sourcebooks Casablanca. It was released in November 2016 and may be found at your preferred vendors. Miss Bates received an e-ARC from Sourcebooks Casablanca, via Netgalley.
11 thoughts on “Amy Sandas’s THE UNTOUCHABLE EARL”
“He’s damaged – and humourless. As is Lily.”
I love your reviews 😀
Thank you! I also liked “agonized, and morose”!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I didn’t like this one either, Miss B. In fact, I have read both books in this series and was very unimpressed by both. I don’t plan to read this author again – I think two chances to get it right are enough.
I hear you totally, that’s my limit as well. One down and I’m wary; two and I fold. I have the third book and will definitely give it a fighting chance because Sandas’s prose is quite adept. But I won’t hesitate to DNF if it’s similar to the touch-me-not earl. In concept, Sandas was trying to do something interesting, but in execution, it failed.
‘When Lily reaches for his manly forearms and such, he’s flinchy and hurt. It’s painful for him.’
That sounds like the WORST book – you poor thing – I have seen it a bit around the traps but I never thought ‘The Untouchable Earl’ was actually UNTOUCHABLE. Wow. Literal romance novel titles… Things I would never have expected!!
See, in concept, it’s kind of an interesting idea. Where it failed is that Sandas used it to write a lot of sex scenes and it does have a certain success there; if you’re looking for that, I can see why some readers would enjoy it. But the characters needed a lot more development to sustain her premise, if that even makes sense?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great review! The older I get (and the more romance I read…) the less patience I have for those “I’m so bad and she’s so pure” heroes. It smacks of what I call The Fetishization of the Hymen. Also I get so bored with paragons of virtues as romance characters. Butter won’t melt in their mouth, they’re kind to the elderly, sickly children and three-legged dogs – yada yada yada. I don’t want to read about unsavory, ill-mannered louts – but a few well placed faults never hurt anyone. We call it “character” 😉
Thank you, I shamefacedly admit I really enjoyed writing it, which I did quickly and without too much thought. I loved The Fetishization of the Hymen: it expresses perfectly why I tossed a lot of snark at Lily’s maidenhead. And I agree: I like flawed characters, imperfect characters, ones of make mistakes, even hurt the other, it makes for vibrant narratives and the stakes to the HEA so much more engaging.
Hi Kay, As usual, you have written a witty and thoughtful review, even if it didn’t really deserve it. After reading the review, I just can’t resist pointing out that an aversion to touch also afflicts the hero of “that book” Christian Grey – perhaps that’s why the heroine has grey eyes? Christian in FSOG is similarly “commanding, dark, agonized, and morose,” to boot. When you toss in the old ‘auctione off against her will in a brothel trope,” I guess you have romance salad. Thanks for saving us all a lot of time by making the review more insightful and probably more amusing than the book! Hoping all is well in your busy life and 2017 is treating you right!
Yeesh, filled in the form wrong above! it’s Joanne!
Greetings! Thank you for all your generosity and so lovely to hear from you! I can’t stand that kind of angsty hero: it’s also very much who Slyvia Day’s Gideon Cross is, like all don’t touch me and controlling. This guy isn’t so bad and Lily does initially show some spine, but she gets more soul-ful and good with each encounter till she’s devoid of all personality. Extending heartfelt wishes for your well-being and a wonderful spring!
Comments are closed.