Murder_At_Kensington_PalaceOy, as if I need another historical mystery with romantic elements to follow, but this cross-genre is appealing to me … so, here I go again with Andrea Penrose’s Wrexford and Sloane Regency-set, slow-burn romance and mystery series. Add this to the pile with Harris’s St. Cyr, Raybourn’s Speedwell, and Ashley’s Holloway.

Murder At Kensington Palace is the series third and I’m sorry I didn’t read the first two. The present volume was so satisfying, however, that it made me an insta-fan and regretful not to have discovered it from the get-go. As with Harris, Raybourn, and Ashley, Penrose creates engaging, easy-to-love protagonists. Like Ashley especially, she fashions an irresistible band-of-sleuths ethos, with a circle of friends, servants, street-people and -children, Bow Street runners, an eagle-eyed, sharp-tongued aged aunt, aiding and abetting the primary protags, compelling, lovable characters in their own right. Wrexford and Sloane are Lord and Lady “statussed,” but their world goes way beyond the ton.

Wrexford is urbane, handsome, sharp-tongued and a chemist. His valet and lab assistant, Tyler, with whom he shares antagonistic banter, is one of the band of truth- and justice-seekers. Wrexford is often accompanied by his I-pretend-I’m-dumb friend Kit Sheffield and Basil Henning. Charlotte’s household is even more eccentric. Charlotte is a widow, who had run away to Italy with her art instructor and left her aristocratic family behind. She moonlights as a political cartoonist under the pseudonym A. J. Quill. Her street persona, for when she disguises as a street urchin to sleuth and nose the truth of a murder, alternates between Magpie and Phoenix. Charlotte lives with Wrexford’s blunt-tongued, knife-wielding cook, McClellan,  and two adopted, adorable, hilarious street urchins, Raven and Hawk, aka Thomas Ravenwood Sloane and Alexander Hawksley Sloane, and affectionately dubbed “the Weasels” by Wrexford. 

Kensington Gardens‘ mystery centres on the murder of Charlotte’s beloved childhood cousin, Cedric, Lord Chittenden; the accused, his twin brother, Nicholas Locke. When Charlotte, with Wrexford’s insistent help, sets out to exonerate Nicholas, she contends with long-buried feelings about the life she left behind and how to reemerge as Lady Charlotte when she’s lived incognito as plain old Charlotte Sloane for years. It is key, however, to infiltrate the ton to help Nicholas. She calls on her Aunt Alison, who proves to be as cool and witty as the Dowager Countess of Grantham, without Violet’s noblesse oblige ‘tude. I thought the mystery itself was fascinating until the resolution. Cedric and Nicholas were mixed up in scientific intrigue and elixir-of-life nonsense, making Wrexford’s knowledge and knife-edge intelligence key to murder’s solution. He is inquiry to the quackery that was going on at the time. But the resolution reminded me of a mad scientist Hollywood b-movie scenario. It turned out laughable where Penrose aimed for dramatic?

Whatever “meh” I thought of the mystery, my insta-love for Wrexford, Sloane, and Co. remained steady throughout. I loved them from the moment Charlotte muttered to Wrexford: ” ‘What a pair we are … Prickly, guarded, afraid of making ourselves vulnerable.’ ” Afraid initially. As the narrative builds, Wrexford and Charlotte’s slow-burn romance flickers and flares, teasing the reader and making her yearn for more. They have three near-kisses that ratcheted the tension horribly and yet deliciously. They also share one of the sexiest waltzes I’ve ever read. And how irresistible is our Wrexford introduction? Note: “The earl settled himself on the sofa, all well-tailored broad shoulders and long-legged elegance.” Perfection in that “well-tailored” incongruity to his “broad shoulders”. And Charlotte noticing how, in pursuit of the truth for her, he neglects getting a haircut. Wrexford does a lot of sexy running-fingers through his long, dark hair. 

The slow burn, however, is beautifully maintained as the background to Wrexford and Charlotte’s friendship, with affectionate quips like this one: “A faint smile tugged at his lips. ‘We are, I suppose, well-acquainted with each other’s eccentricities and have learned to put up with them.’ ” And heart-wrenching bits like “She managed a shaky exhale and allowed herself to sink back against the pillows. ‘I’m very grateful for –‘ ‘Love doesn’t require gratitude,’ he said.” And then the tension flaring with the deep love they have for each other, yet unspoken and dormant as it is: ” ‘Without you, I would have given up long ago.’ ‘I would do anything for you,’ he said softly. ‘Would you?’ Charlotte set down the book and box of cards. ‘Then please … ‘ She moved a step closer and reached up to press her palm to his cheek. ‘Don’t be so hard on yourself. I can’t bear to see you trapped in such shadows.’ ” I loved it and them.

Penrose’s other great strength, other than the yummy romance, is the love of friends and family Charlotte and Wrexford built around them: “She had somehow gathered a mismatched circle of friends around her during the past few years. They had become very dear to her. Once again, she was aware of how frighteningly vulnerable she felt because of it. A solitary existence was far safe, uncomplicated by the complexities of emotions. Danger now held more consequences than the question of her own measly survival. The boys depended on her … ” Ah, the boys, Wrexford’s beloved “Weasels” (how tender is it that he has found them a tutor? how loving is Charlotte’s heart-weakness for them? teaching them to draw, muttering motherly threats about “no jam tarts,” which McLennan affectionately bakes for them, hugging them and giving them a world of love and care and knowledge where they had none). Raven and Hawk are funny, smart, and vulnerable in how much they love Charlotte and both love and are in awe of Wrexford. In the end, the most winning aspect of Penrose’s wonderful series is the conclusion Charlotte and Wrexford come to together and apart, that love is primary, makes life worth living, and deserves our greatest care and protection. And why I await the next book in the series as I do Raybourn’s, Harris’s, and Ashley’s. With Miss Austen, we find, in Murder At Kensington Palace, “a mind lively and at ease,” Emma.

Andrea Penrose’s Murder At Kensington Palace is published by Kensington Books. It was released in September 2019 and may be found at your preferred vendors. I am grateful to Kensington Books for an e-galley, via Netgalley.

17 thoughts on “REVIEW: Andrea Penrose’s MURDER AT KENSINGTON PALACE

  1. Great review. Wrexford and Sloan is another one of my favourite series. I am so happy that we have so many excellent choices in this genre.

    Have you read Ashley Weaver’s “Amory Ames” series? It’s another good series that is set in 1930s English high society. Rather than a couple getting together, the couple in this series (Amory and Milo) are working on repairing their marriage. At the start of the series Milo returns home from his life as a European playboy, ( I have theories about what Milo was really up to, and I hope we’ll see if they are correct as the series continues). The following books have developed this relationship, and its slow the rebuilding. The mystery plots are decent as well.


    1. Thank you!! Yes, “oy,” now it’s another favourite of mine too. But, you’re right, I love this hybrid genre and there are such great books in it, with all the elements I love. Kindred spirits, I’d say.

      And thank you for the rec … I don’t need another one … but it sounds great and I LOVE marriage-in-trouble stories. Happy reading!


  2. Oh, I am so glad you loved this! Now, treat yourself to reading the first two, if only for the very emotional scene where Wrexford gives the boys their names. I think I love the Weasels even more than our main couple.
    I will agree that the climactic scene was straight from the Grade B Saturday Matinee ‘Mad Scientist’ movies. But such movies were a staple of my tween years and I have a soft spot for them.

    ps I am re-reading CS Harris’s ‘Who Slays the Wicked’ in preparation for the release of her new one (“Who Speaks for the Damned”), which comes out next month.


    1. LOVED, LURVED, you name it. I actually have a soft spot for those grade B movies too. I grew up watching them on Saturday afts. and they remind me of a happy, narrative-filled childhood.

      I ADORE THE WEASELS!!!! They’re a hoot. I also feel that way about Wrexford and his broad shoulders and overly-long hair.

      I have that on the TBR to go next, the Who Slays the Wicked. I’m getting through Spencer-Fleming’s All Mortal Flesh and the volumes that follow in anticipation of a long-awaited new book in the series. Don’t know if you’re a fan? Many people went off this series, but I still like it. It’s a different animal. But I’ll take a hiatus and read Who Slays, I think. It’s too delicious sitting there on my shelf (only paper will do for St. Cyr) to wait any longer. Happy reading!


      1. The Weasels are so much fun, and I loved how they got their “proper” names. I have also listened to the audiobooks of this series (borrowed from the library), and they are excellent.

        Sorry, not sorry for adding another series to your list 😇. My next book will be A Treacherous Curse and then Why Kill the Innocent – I am so far behind.


  3. Thanks for another great review. I loved the first 2 books in the series – especially the Weasels, and the review has just promted me to download the audio book of the 3rd instalment.
    Also looking forward to the new C. S. Harris and Julia Spencer-Fleming. Ooo


    1. You’re welcome, of course!

      It seems to be a universal truth that readers LOVE the Weasels … and with good reason. They’re adorable, funny, and still evoke pathos. They deserve all the love Wrexford, Charlotte, McClellan, and Tyler lavish on them.

      Yes to the Harris and frissons of excitement for a new, finally, J.S.F.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Another historical mystery series I need to catch up on. I’m a longtime fan of Andrea Penrose, and I like her other series too; the Lady Arianna mysteries. Not least for the chocolate recipes! In the meantime I’ve added several new ones to the pile. I recently binged the first 5 books of Victoria Thompson’s Gaslight Mystery series, and have you heard of The Richmond Thief by Lisa Boero or Lady Helena Investigates by Jane Steen? So many books, so little time!


    1. So many great recs … I will look for those. I have the first THREE Thompson-Gaslights in the TBR. Did you say “chocolate recipes”?

      I’m blown away at the responses to how much these hybrid books are beloved by readers. It’s fantastic! Happy reading!


      1. Yes, the first Lady Arianna mystery, “Sweet Revenge”, and I believe the second also, “The Cocoa Conspiracy” have very interesting chocolate recipes. The MCs are interested in chocolate, both from a scientific and culinary POV.


Comments are closed.